Hello again.
I'm going to have to reiterate my earlier points about what you have stated as fact; Reminder:-
Quote:
sw1967 wrote:
the research I have done in the past few days shows that UK banks seem to have a high percentage of "scam" money moving through them.
Cite your research, without example there is no substance and your post becomes a theory, nothing more.
sw1967 wrote:
When people complain it appears that very little progress is made because the "investor" is not a member of the bank and as you point out they invested in the first place.
How have you come to this conclusion, you have not cited any references to back up your statement.
sw1967 wrote:
As has been shown in my research the money does not stay in the UK banks for long and is moved straight out.
Cite your research, without example there is no substance and your post becomes a theory, nothing more.
The simple fact is, you have not provided any form of research or references to back up what you have said. You have made
unsubstanciated statements that target a banking system.
sw1967 wrote:
I hope that you will accept this a not just a theory now.
From the point of view of what you have stated, and your supposed 'evidence', yes it is still a theory. All you have provided is a number of PDF's containing copies of email communications from fraudsters. There is nothing in there to back up what you call 'research', it has nothing to do with a banking system (flawed or otherwise).
sw1967 wrote:
I wasn't aware that to open a discussion I needed to post examples documents etc.
You don't. However, you have made broad sweeping comments about a banking system and have simply not backed it up with anything concrete from your supposed 'research'. In short, it is
unfair and
unsubstanciated. The PDF's only reinforce one thing, the communications are from scammers. It is not research for or against any banking system.
sw1967 wrote:
You seem to have taken it personally
A forum is for discussion, I do not take forum posts personally.
When an anti-fraud forum is being used in an unfair manner I will certainly point it out, as I have done here. You may not like/appreciate the scrutiny, but I'm simply asking you to clarify the statements you have made, for the benefit of all. If you cannot or will not, then it remains
theory, not research.